Survey of the UK fiduciary management market

Welcome to the latest survey of the UK’s fiduciary management market conducted by IC Select. This is the first time we’ve published findings from our annual surveys, and we hope they contain useful insights into unfolding trends in the sector. This report draws on analysis contained in previous surveys as well as our most recent survey to give a broader picture of the fiduciary management market extending over five years, and in some instances longer.

Pensions Expert Article: Big schemes turn to fiduciary managers during pandemic

This article was published in Pensions Expert, bBenjamin Mercer | September 7, 2021


Data crunch: The average size of a pension scheme taking on a fiduciary manager rose by around 80 per cent during the Covid-19 pandemic, suggesting the flexibility afforded by the model was particularly attractive in turbulent market conditions, according to research from IC Select.


The pandemic accelerated an existing trend, the research found, as the UK fiduciary management market has grown by 14 per cent a year over the past five years by number of clients, with assets under management up 22 per cent a year over the same period.

Press Release: Size of schemes converting to fiduciary management surges in H1

Size of schemes converting to fiduciary management surges in H1

September 07, 2021 - The average size of a pension scheme taking on a fiduciary manager shot up by nearly 80% during the first half of the year as the benefits of the model took hold in the thick of the Covid-19 pandemic, according to IC Select.

In its latest annual survey of the fiduciary management sector, published today, IC Select found that the average size of a UK pension scheme recruiting a fiduciary manager to oversee its assets rose by 79% to £270 million over the six months to 30th June 2021.[1]

That marks an increase of £120 million against the average figure over the preceding five years, which stood at roughly £150 million, according to IC Select’s research.

Pensions Expert Article: Investment oversight – trustees should ‘mind the gap'

This article was published in Pensions Expert, by Peter Dorward| June 2, 2021

Independent oversight of investment consultants and fiduciary managers remains low among defined benefit pension funds, despite mounting regulatory pressure and scrutiny of trustees.

This missing governance gap should be a priority considering investments account for 80 per cent of the total cost of pension fund ownership, and therefore should matter most to both sponsors and members.

Industry research shows independent fiduciary manager oversight remains low at around 22 per cent of funds, in contrast to more than 70 per cent of funds that now use independent evaluators to undertake selection exercises.

The situation in advisory relationships is even more alarming. Independent oversight of investment advisers is almost non-existent, despite these having the greatest impact on whether a pension scheme can meet its liabilities.

Have trustees got used to setting consultant objectives?

  • The CMA Review highlighted the lack of demand side challenge by trustees of their investment advisers.
  • As far as setting consultant objectives, trustees still seem to be 'kicking the can down the road'.
  • It’s not sufficient for trustees to allow investment consultants to set, and mark, their own homework.